Back a long time ago, the idea of blocking was pretty straightforward. It was really about stage picture. You stand there. Or I stand here. Or you sit on this line. Or I stand on this line. There are moments when making specific movements across the stage or movements on the set are prescribed in a precise way that we need you to do this now because of something that happens in the script.

But the truth is that much of what happens in blocking is a collaboration between actor and director. It is the exploration of the actor’s actions and needs in a given moment in a scene. It’s easy to take for granted something as simple as walking across a room or where you stand in a space. But the following simple examples may help you understand how meaningful blocking can be in the performing arts.

So, if you picture a fairly traditional theater with the audience on one side and the stage on the other, you can then imagine an actor standing in the middle of that space, facing the audience, in a stance that means something, right? This person is alone. Depending on how big the space is, we experience something about the scale of a human being in this space. We might think about how that person is or isn’t like us as an audience member.

Now, turn that person away from you so that they’re facing away. That’s right; they’re facing upstage. Suddenly, I lose all sorts of information. I can’t see that person’s face or expressions. As an audience member, I’ve lost information, but I’ve gained potential interest. You might not be aware of these perceptions unless you have a performing arts education.

Now, what if that person extends their arms really wide, opens their chest up, but I can’t see their face? You can imagine that any one of those choices makes a big difference to how we experience whatever that person says in that moment. But it can be challenging to interpret that person’s stance, movements, and gestures without the help of facial expressions.

It becomes even more exciting and complicated when you have multiple characters onstage. If I have two actors very far downstage, very close to the audience, huddled together, whispering to each other, my experience as an audience member is going to be one of tremendous intimacy.

But if I keep one of those actors very close and send another far away upstage, it’s going to change my relationship with one of them with whom I have a much closer, intimate relationship to that other person who is much further away. I might begin to have an empathic response to the person who’s closer compared to the one who’s more distant.

As an actor, it’s valuable to understand that your audience is experiencing, particularly in theater, your work as a kind of three-dimensional sculpture that’s constantly changing shape. As a director, it’s important to understand that everywhere that bodies are in space communicates something to your audience, as you might learn from an online performing arts education. So, it’s better for that communication to be intentional rather than accidental.

People give theater critics a bad name. More often than not, they think of a theater critic as a person who says just negative things. “[There’s] a stereotype of the place, it’s opening night, and then everyone has kind of raced to the bar essentially, and they’ve looked at the newspaper. And the newspaper says ‘Oh, this play is terrible,'” states Dr. Harvey Young, an online performing arts education professional. “And that’s not actually the job of a theater critic.”

The job of a theater critic is actually to be an honest, objective, and reliable performing arts education source for a larger public. Their purpose is to acknowledge that not all of their readers will ever go see the play, but that they still want to be informed. They want to know more about what is happening.

The critic will tell readers, honestly, what they think of the production and be objective. They are not related to anyone who made the play. They are not an actor in the production. They will just tell you whether or not it is worthwhile for you to spend your hard-earned money and two to three hours of your time to attend the event and to see the show.

The performing arts critic is not going to be negative. They’ll just be honest. That is the job of a theater critic: to connect with the reader and share their opinion. The thing about theater critics is that those critics who are truly negative never last long. You’ll notice that likable theater critics become the most passionate and ardent advocates for certain productions. “[If] you look at the theater criticism around “In the Heights,” which was Lin-Manuel Miranda’s play before “Hamilton,” that play was nurtured, it was supported, it was sort of praised again and again by theater critics going, ‘Hey, you’ve got to go see this thing,'” Dr. Young says.

The same thing happened with the work of Tennessee Williams. People had no idea who Tennessee Williams was. It was early theater critics who said, “There’s something happening down the street. You’ve got to go check this out.” When “A Raisin in the Sun” first came out, there was a buzz created by critics. It was critics who saw the play in New Haven, Chicago, and Philadelphia, preparing an audience on Broadway for its arrival there.

Lloyd Richards, who directed the play, remembered standing in the ticket lobby of the theater. An African-American woman arrived to buy a ticket and he asked her, “What inspires you to see this production?” She replied, “Well, it was Sidney Poitier. He’s in this.”

“Well, you can see Sidney Poitier on screen for a fraction of the price,” replied Lloyd Richards. Her response was “I’ve heard about this play, and I’ve heard it concerns me.”

That quote, “I’ve heard it concerns me,” is a testament to the power of theater critics to get the word out about why theater matters for people.

When considering the roles of the arranger, orchestrator and music supervisor, Simon Hale thinks it’s useful to explain a little bit about what those three jobs entail. An arranger, he informs us, takes an existing piece of music, a song in this case, and adapts it for another purpose. That can be a pretty radical alteration, or it can be quite gentle. It really depends on the circumstance.

However, it will have obvious building-block components like the key, the rhythm, the structure and instrumentation. All those blocks that make up a song or a piece of music can be completely changed. Obviously, you wouldn’t change any lyrics in a song—though you might change the order of verses, perhaps—but that’s the only thing.

You can change chords if you are going to rearrange something. You can add countermelodies. You can be really radical, actually, and make something sound completely different from how it did originally. But it is still the same song, just in a very, very different expression.

Imagine that we take a picture frame as an example. If you’re an arranger, you’ve got the chance to say, you know what? I’m going to put that picture right on the opposite wall. And oh, it’s not going to be square. It’s going to be 3 feet by 4 feet. And it’s going to be slightly off-center; it’s going to be slightly skewed. And it’s got a kind of gnarly bit up on upper right-hand side. This all sounds a little bit crass, but an orchestrator takes what an arranger or someone else has done and then shapes that into their own design.

For example, as an orchestrator, you’ll be given the picture frame. And it already has a load of information in it—the key, the structure, the shape, all those kinds of things. You have to think, OK, I want this to have a bit of yellow up in the top, around the corner, and a bit of sharp imagery down here. You’re filling in detail and coloring as well as deciding what the essence of it is.

But you’re not deciding major things like the key and the structure. They’ve already been done. That’s what the arranger does. An arranger decides on the shape of the music in a very, very powerful way. The orchestrator takes the music that’s been chosen and designs the specific detailed elements for the boundary. The music supervisor will then look at the overall music department. They could potentially be choosing an orchestrator or an arranger. Those roles could be filled by the same person.

The music supervisor is looking at the overall musical context, making sure that everything is the way it should be, liaising with unions, liaising with the director, with producers, with GMs, all those kinds of things. They’re also, monitoring the show on an ongoing basis to make sure that it stays in the shape everyone wants it to and remains the way it was from opening night.

Relationships with other people as part of a theatrical production are an interesting thing to think about.

If you’d like to pursue a performing arts education and learn more about the various specific roles you might play in the performing arts, the traditional approach isn’t the only avenue open to you. You might find it much more accessible and convenient to engage in an online performing arts education.

Let’s talk about flooring and how it impacts a dance.

Let’s say you’re working in tap shoes. Tap shoes, as we all know, have metal on the bottom of each shoe, right? Well, if you’re tapping, then that surface you’re tapping on is important.

Is it tile?
Is it wood?
Is it cork?
Is it slippery?
Is it sticky?

You need to know the answers to these questions to provide the best performance possible.

Furniture can also double as flooring, which means you need to know how all of the onstage elements interact together. These elements are going to give you wonderful choices. If you said, “Oh, I’d like them to dance on that piece of furniture, or I’d like them to tap on that piece of furniture.” Well, you need to make sure that the particular piece of furniture is, first of all, going to allow you to do that instead of unsafe for a dancer to use and a fall or collapse risk.

Performing Arts Education

Your online performing arts education can help you better understand all of the elements of a stage, set or other performance area. It opens your eyes to what you need to take into account to make a performance a success. It can also teach you how to do a better job at protecting yourself and others from common accidents.

“Props are anything that an actor might touch or handle,” Gianni Downs says. “Sometimes you might refer to them as properties. And you can think of them in a couple of different ways.”

Hand props are props that actors will carry around with them. There are set props that may exist in a room, such as a furniture that an actor cannot move on their own. Then there are decorative props, such as curtains hanging on the wall or paintings that may be present. You can think of anything that isn’t built by the carpentry shop as a prop. These are frequently things that you might come across in your daily life.

Is the couch upholstered? What type of upholstery is it? Is it made of wood? Is it made of metal? These elements may tell the audience in a matter of seconds who the individual in a room is or what the play is about. This is considered to be performing arts.

When it comes to staging design, such small changes may significantly influence. And these are the kinds of judgments that a designer must make regularly.

And it is your responsibility to make those decisions. And your choices should be influenced by the program you’re working on as well as the characters that inhabit it. These skills can be acquired through online performing arts education.

Often, there will be a significant meal scene in many older programs. And this may be for a Christmas party or a particular function. A table scene can often serve as the focal point of an entire play.

One props designer told me that mashed potatoes are used in almost all her creations. As a result, she can shape it into a variety of different shapes. She can dye it in a variety of colors.

It’s also simple for people to consume. Furthermore, almost no one is allergic to it. So you’ll often see mounds of different things on a plate that people are eating. And it could be mashed potatoes.

Alcohol is another thing that is very common in the theater. So many shows revolve around people making poor choices. And those decisions are frequently made while under the influence of alcohol.

As a result, a large part of my job as a scene designer is to plan out where the furniture will be placed on the stage. The director and I will work closely together to determine where items will go, how they will be set, and what angle they will be.

Performing arts education helps in decision making. It’s a good idea to consider what kinds of chairs may exist in the environment you’re building. Are there any weapons? Is this a high-backed chair?

And if you’re going to drink on stage, you should drink something that looks like alcohol but won’t get the actor intoxicated. As a result, flat soda is frequently used. Food coloring and water can be used.

It may be fluids. I’ve heard of people using different teas to achieve different hues. And you can come across property designers who have recipe books for various types of booze, whether it’s brandy, whiskey, or something else. You can be seeking something, or the script might be asking for something.

One of the fundamental truths about the theater is that it’s about community. Even if you have a physical theater, it’s still about the community. My favorite theater is the Lookingglass Theatre in Chicago at the Goodman, where I lived for 15 years. I live in Boston now, and soon there will be a new favorite Boston theater.

When you think about your favorite theater, you remember that it’s a place where the people would gather. That’s why it’s essential for theater companies and programs to engage in the local communities.

Theaters Canvassing Neighborhoods are Crucial for Performing Arts Programs

The primary responsibility of theater companies and programs is to link the physical theater buildings, spaces, and productions to multiple communities within a city. This is the key to a successful and thriving theater. You can’t just imagine a play, open the doors, and expect people to come. You have to engage with the local communities.

Even if the theater has subscribers, their goal and obligation is to impact the conversations within the society. Community education specialists and directors of community engagement will go out and build partnerships within local communities. Sometimes this includes productions where actors will go out and canvas local areas. They will go to places like schools and libraries to talk about the theater content and sociohistorical components of the production. They will discuss their own lives and stories to build connections with the people in the area. They are trying to convey that the community is not just for the actors; it’s for everyone. It’s everyone’s theater.

The fact is that the theater is always in need of new audiences. The theater building may be there for over 100 years, but it’s not enough to bring in the people by itself. The theater crew has to go out and do the work of bringing in audience members. Community specialists are responsible for going out and gathering the culturally aware people that create the evolving dynamic of theater audiences.

The benefit of this kind of canvassing work is that many people haven’t spent much time thinking about the theater, but they have studied it at some point. Remember those Shakespeare plays you had to read in high school. Now, you have an actual theater company talking about literature, language, self-expression, and the reality of transporting a person into the world of theater.

It doesn’t make a difference if you love Shakespeare or not. There is still an appreciation for his theater skills. Those skills of self-expression, telling a story concisely and passionately, and reading history through culture. These are the things that you want people to take with them when they leave the theater.

Theater Arts Bring Communities Together

There is a whole way of thinking with this kind of outreach. For example, interacting with the kids at school can quickly spread to other people that they know. The communication within the kids soon reaches their parents, grandparents, siblings, and neighbors. This sense of community is why this work is so important. Communities can be brought together through the arts.

When people think about the many different roles played in the theater, they often refer to only the actors on stage. They usually don’t think about the people who are out making the theater an active part of their lives. These are the people that work off-stage and behind the scenes.

These are the people that are working in offices somewhere. They talk with people in the neighborhood about what’s going on and the concerns surrounding those things.

The theater stage is also a great place to talk about social issues, including relationships and health issues. The theater is a way to acknowledge real problems that people can relate to. Every family is strained at some point in time. Those individuals who have to portray these issues in the theater can help make a difference in the real world.

All of these reasons and more are why the people who specialize in community engagement are so important. There is no one more active or integral in terms of a larger ripple effect of theater than these folks.

One thing that comes up a fair amount in performing arts is the feeling that I’m trying to communicate something with these words but I don’t understand how it works in my body. So, I really advocate for people thinking about acting through using action verbs.

It’s something that’s been around for a long time. In performing arts education, we often talk about actioning a script or using action verbs to talk about what you’re doing to another person. If you had a very simple text, like “I love you,” that you were saying to somebody, rather than simply loving them with that text, can you think of something more specific that you’re doing? Maybe you are adoring that person.

But I can also imagine a very interesting scene where someone says, “I love you,” but the action they’re playing is eviscerating. I’m interested in what that means. It’s exciting for an audience, too, when something about the action you’re playing and the text support each other but don’t necessarily simply duplicate each other. It produces a reason for the audience to lean forward to try to investigate what it is that they’re experiencing.

And while that might make perfectly logical sense in text, I think it’s, sometimes, harder for actors to understand. But that’s also true in their body. If I’m saying, “I love you,” but my action is eviscerating, that’s going to manifest in my body in some way. That way might be enormous. It might be very small. But it’s going to be present, especially if, as you explore a text even before you get into rehearsal, you’re thinking about those action verbs.

We know now that simply thinking about action verbs starts to spark some of the same parts of your brain that doing those action verbs would do.

“I was a great admirer of the novel Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime,” says Elizabeth Bradley. “And at one point, I thought it would be a great idea to teach a course on adaptation. And if I had ever done such a thing, and have not done so yet, I would probably have used that novel as an example of how impossible it actually is to translate the core ethos of a beautifully constructed novel to the stage.”

Well, how wrong could I possibly have been? Because watching Marianne Elliott’s adaptation of Curious Incident in the Nighttime, I sat there and thought, I mean, I’m ready to fall in love with the theater all over again. Because this kind of enlivened theatrical imagination, if you can do this, the theater can do anything. So just when you think, “no,” somebody comes along and says, “yes,” and brilliantly.

It was a different kind of challenge. Of course, that is written in letter form. I think it’s called an epistolary novel. Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote a letter to his son about the reality of living his life as a Black male in America and as a young Black male in America—an important concept in performing arts education.

And the way the adaptation was handled was through a rotating cast of readers, both men and women who tackled sections of the scored book. By scored, I mean the original music composition that was created to accompany the read prose text created another whole piece of emotional access leverage if you will. You felt like you were falling into the words via the music, in a way that you couldn’t really have done sitting at home reading it, no matter how profound that experience was. And I would argue that both have value in the performing arts.

American Theater has this odd attachment to its own mortality. In the 1940s, Arthur Miller was writing plays like All My Sons and Death of a Salesman in America. This was a prime time for American theater. These plays were taking charge across broadway. Arthur Miller made statements about how he wished the theater across the pond in the UK was happy like the theater in America.

Good Theater Never Dies

By the time you get to the 1930s and 1940s, you’re looking at the emergence of Odet’s plays, Arthur Miller’s plays, and Tennessee William’s plays. These were all very popular at the time and still today. Eugene O’Neill appeared twice in the 1910s and 1920s. He then came back after he died in posthumous performances like Long Day’s Journey.

Performing Arts is an Experience that Dates Back to the Early Greeks

What makes American theater great is the sense of sitting around, hearing the stories of your neighbors, all while actually sitting next to your neighbors. This concept goes back to the earliest moment of the Greeks. The most important and magical moment in theater is when you walk through the door. It’s the experience of what you are doing and what you are about to be doing. This represents tracing of the past to the present. It’s something that’s not unlike what the ancient Greeks encountered and experienced back then.

Theater Is a Community Experience

So you walk into this playing area, look around, and see your neighbors. You look on stage and notice familiar faces from the community. You hear stories of adventures that you are going on vicariously through these people. The drama transports you beyond the stage and arena into a world beyond the theater. Together, you are seeing life being portrayed.

When you’re analyzing a script, I think you might do well to sort of pick one of those characters and track all those tensions, and then pick two characters and understand how the conflict’s happening. Then pick the family and understand where the conflict’s happening. It’s a show full of a lot of conflict. Characters are in conflict with each other, inside the family and outside the family.

On top of it, the mother decides that she’s going to buy a house. She’s going to buy a house in a white neighborhood. So, everybody has to ask, “What does it mean to, sort of, grow?” But there’s a plant that’s struggling to live, struggling to live in the sun, struggling to live in the sun like a raisin in the sun. Is it going to be the raisin or is it going to grow?

It doesn’t have a lot of sustenance, but it’s got love. It’s got attention. It’s got what the family can give it. So, on some level that’s what the show is about. It’s also about the family to sort of come apart in certain ways, so that they can then come together again. That’s what I think the play is about, and that’s how, as an actor, that’s what I would suggest. If I was scoring it, if I was directing it, I would say, “OK, where do those tensions live? This incident that happens… what is being revealed, and what is being played with, and what is being exposed?” What opportunities do the characters have to transcend where they are, to think of new stuff, to take a chance and to think of something new?

That’s how I would analyze this script, that’s how I would see my way through this—through this artificial thing called a play that happens to be called “Raisin in the Sun.”

[In performing arts,] what human stuff can be brought out? That’s how I would approach the script analysis. I challenge you all to try to uncover that stuff for yourselves.