A musical director in a theatrical show, in a Broadway show, or in a musical is the person who is the head of the show’s music department. So, a musical director is a person who is in control of how the music is expressed. The musical director typically teaches the music, and music on a page is one thing, but music inside bodies is another thing.

First of all, what is the story? The musical director should have a very clear idea of the story, and that idea should be something where they are in collaboration and conversation with the writers, assuming they’re alive and present. They should certainly be in communication with the director who is in control of the entire production in a musical theater piece. Typically, the choreographer and lighting designer are also involved in these conversations.

You’re all creating this big animal together that takes a lot of people to put together. There’s music. There are costumes. There’s hair. There’s movement. There’s acting. There’s figuring out where on stage things happen. What’s the best way for someone to sing? How should they pronounce this word? What word should they hit? What syllables should they hit in a particular melody?

How should that melody come out? Should it be loud or soft? Should it have vibrato or not have vibrato? All of these questions are ones that are inside the musical director’s province.

Additionally, the musical director is also sometimes playing the show, playing the piano, playing the guitar. If there’s a band, typically, the musical director is integrating the band—controlling how the band sounds and how they sound with the actors. And when I say how it sounds, in larger shows, there will be someone who takes the music that they’re given, whether it’s written down or not, and they will orchestrate it. They will decide what instruments are going to play. They’ll decide how things are arranged.

If you have an interest in pursuing a career as a musical director, or any career in the performing arts, consider exploring online performing arts education. Obtaining a solid performing arts education will help equip you with the knowledge and skills you need to reach many of your goals.

There are many valuable lessons found in online performing arts education. Based on his experience in performing arts, Gianni Downs tells us, “There are three major stage configurations. There is the proscenium stage, which is essentially what you might think of as a theater. A lot of the Broadway houses are proscenium stages. You might see musicals produced on a proscenium stage.” These are set up so that the audience is on one side, and the action is happening on another side, often with a frame around the action. That is the proscenium arch itself. This is a very common type of theater and is very useful for hiding scene changes. Musicals spend a lot of time in proscenium stages.

“A proscenium is an arch,” says Jeff Kaplan, who has years of performing arts education. “Next time that you’re in a theater, look at the shape above the curtain. It makes a picture frame. So, the idea is that you’re looking into a diorama. You’re looking into a world. And traditionally, the performers are inside that world, and you and the audience are on the outside. That forms the fourth wall, but that’s not the only way that you can do it.”

Gianni Downs picks up from there. “Another common theater-type is the 3/4 thrust. You’ll see a lot of regional theaters and off-Broadway theaters will use a 3/4 thrust stage. This is where the action will project into the audience, making a horseshoe shape of the audience. So, the audience sits on 3/4 of the sides of the action of the play.” This is often more used for straight plays or more intimate plays. A very famous 3/4 thrust is the Guthrie Theater, and it might provide a good reference for what that looks like.

Jeff Kaplan then finishes, “There’s theater-in-the-round, which is pretty much what it sounds like. The audience is on all sides, or maybe 3/4. Arena Stage in Baltimore is a very famous example of that.” Circle in the Square in New York is largely a theater-in-the-round. That’s a fascinating experience in which there’s no front where you’re all inside of this world. It’s like a virtual-reality theater.

Typically, a producer is somebody who’s leading the ship. When you’re the producer, in many cases, you’re both everyone’s friend and everyone’s enemy. You’re also the person signing their paychecks. Sometimes, you may even be their therapist. Being a producer can look many different ways.

Particularly in the world of the independent theater industry, because the budgets are smaller and it tends to involve renting a space, it’s inevitably going to be a smaller creative team. As a producer, you’ll need people to do a bit more than they expect to be doing, and it’s only because you want to get the show running. Because of this, though, you have to be flexible, and be able to avoid getting stuck in a rigid space.

As a producer, you tend to be the one that everybody looks to. Personally, I have been a part of productions where I haven’t necessarily attended every rehearsal, because I haven’t needed to; there’s a director that was hired, and there’s an entire creative team. However, I’m there at auditions, I’m there at the first rehearsal, and I make myself available.

I don’t find the need to be micromanaging at every rehearsal, though, because I’m not a micromanager. Because I know this about myself, I know I don’t need to attend every one, but I do make a point to let people know that I’m available for whatever comes up. When stuff does happen, it isn’t the time for a meltdown—as the producer, nobody cares about your feelings. You need to fix it. You need to get it going, and make it work.

To learn more about the world of being a producer, both standard performing arts education and online performing arts education can be very beneficial as a starting point.

A scenic designer needs to have several different skills. You can think of a designer as a Jack or Jane of all trades. You have to know a little bit about color theory. You have to know a little bit about how to draw as well as art and architectural history. You have to know how buildings are constructed. These are all things that you can learn on the fly, but it’s a good idea to practice them as you’re starting out. I recommend that everyone aspiring to be a scenic designer take some drawing classes. Doing that alone will help propel you toward a career in theater design more quickly.

One you’ve developed some basic skills, you’re going to need to learn how to draft. You can do so using a pencil or pen, but most people will be using AutoCAD or Vectorworks or some other CAD drafting program. Fortunately, these are technology skills that are actually quite easy to learn. In fact, you might start with a program like SketchUp and import something that you designed there into another program so that you can turn it into a more clear drawing. This way, it will be easier to understand when you give it to others.

You might also need to learn how to paint digitally. Oftentimes, I will choose to work in different programs. For example, I’ll do my drafting in Vectorworks; then, I will do my painting in Photoshop. After that, I’ll combine the two and make a 3-D model with either Vectorworks or SketchUp. From there, I’ll make a walkthrough of my set so that a director and the actors can see what it will look like from various points in the house or even on stage.

I’ve had 3-D models used to sell products. I’ve had 3-D models used in film. I’ve even had to create 3-D models to be used in projection work behind live theater as well. As a theater designer, you never stop learning because technology changes all the time, and your ability to communicate with other people needs to adapt as well.

To learn more about the world of theater design and the performing arts, consider getting started with online performing arts education. This form of performing arts education allows you to gain valuable experience and learn from the comfort of your own home.

One of the questions that always comes up is, “How can I have a sustainable life in the theater?” This is a key question. It is key not only because it allows us as artists to engage in the work that we do, but also because it supports our livelihood.

Sometimes I’ll meet the parent of a young student considering pursuing a performing arts education, and that parent will turn to me and say, “Well, my kid wants to go into theater, but we all know that they’re not going to make any money, and they’re going to starve, and I don’t want them to go through that.” They add, “And we all know theater doesn’t really matter. We all know that it’s just kind of decoration.”

Well, they’re talking to the wrong person, because I go a little bit over the top on this. Number one, the idea that theater doesn’t matter is altogether wrong. It’s just wrong. The theater is not only an important art field because I’m involved in it, and I care about it, so I think it’s important. Actually, history has proven it a vital space for community discourse and for the investigating of ideas in a community.

Further proof is that if you think of any really stringent political dictatorship in the history of the world, one of the first things that they will do is either get rid of all the art forms or try to control them. Trust me — if the performing arts didn’t matter, they would expend no time on even being concerned about them.

But they do matter. They matter because they change history, because they change thought, because they change opinion, because they change our minds and our hearts, and because they bring a community into a conversation. And so, to me, theater is essential. The fundamental idea driving the heart of theater is that artists either will celebrate those beliefs, or integrate those beliefs, and that is what drives our work.

What’s interesting is that when we integrate those beliefs, it actually creates the society’s new beliefs. And that begins to create a cycle of how societies really begin to understand themselves, understand their beliefs, and understand how they function.

So, to me, theater is a vibrant space not only for what really is the sustainability of a community, but also for the health of a community. And that becomes a really, important thing. So there we are — theater is important.

Studying theater is important, too. Your online performing arts education can be the start of an ongoing conversation that leads you to play a role in shaping society’s beliefs.

I do a lot of research about the time and the place when I start a new piece of material or undertake a new character. I feel so lucky that I live close to the Met because I can go and look at paintings. Especially with “Hamilton,” I can see paintings from that time, see how they make me feel. I can feel what women are saying within those paintings, within those portraits, because that’s all we have from that time. The research process is half online performing arts education and half real-world experiences and feelings applied to your character.

I try to look as much as I can to people that know more than me about the time period, about all of the facts, to get to the truth. Then, I have to really look into myself and see what my subtext is. What is underneath all of those facts? Is there an accent? Where is she from? When was she born? What’s underneath all of those things?

Sometimes a character can be very relatable to my own life, like Nina Rosario. I felt so connected to that character, because I’m the first one in my family to go to college. I always did things not just for myself, but with the notion that I was doing something more for my family and my community. That was a big part of my upbringing.

Nina was so much like that, and she took a lot of the weight of the world on her shoulders. I understood where she was coming from. I knew what her intention was, and I knew what her truth was, because it was just part of me. So, I had to bring that to the performance, which can be the hardest part, being vulnerable, being open to whatever’s going to happen.

I’m not robotic. I like to go in and breathe with the other actors and see where they are that night and what they’re giving me, and see how that moves me, how that moves my character, and see what I give them back. You can learn a lot from a performing arts education and also learn a lot from your fellow actors and their processes and performances.

It’s a very organic feeling every night, and I love that. I wouldn’t want it any other way. When you have an acting partner that also works that way, it’s just magic. The basic way that I try to build a character is really from the ground up and through honesty and through my truth.

Back a long time ago, the idea of blocking was pretty straightforward. It was really about stage picture. You stand there. Or I stand here. Or you sit on this line. Or I stand on this line. There are moments when making specific movements across the stage or movements on the set are prescribed in a precise way that we need you to do this now because of something that happens in the script.

But the truth is that much of what happens in blocking is a collaboration between actor and director. It is the exploration of the actor’s actions and needs in a given moment in a scene. It’s easy to take for granted something as simple as walking across a room or where you stand in a space. But the following simple examples may help you understand how meaningful blocking can be in the performing arts.

So, if you picture a fairly traditional theater with the audience on one side and the stage on the other, you can then imagine an actor standing in the middle of that space, facing the audience, in a stance that means something, right? This person is alone. Depending on how big the space is, we experience something about the scale of a human being in this space. We might think about how that person is or isn’t like us as an audience member.

Now, turn that person away from you so that they’re facing away. That’s right; they’re facing upstage. Suddenly, I lose all sorts of information. I can’t see that person’s face or expressions. As an audience member, I’ve lost information, but I’ve gained potential interest. You might not be aware of these perceptions unless you have a performing arts education.

Now, what if that person extends their arms really wide, opens their chest up, but I can’t see their face? You can imagine that any one of those choices makes a big difference to how we experience whatever that person says in that moment. But it can be challenging to interpret that person’s stance, movements, and gestures without the help of facial expressions.

It becomes even more exciting and complicated when you have multiple characters onstage. If I have two actors very far downstage, very close to the audience, huddled together, whispering to each other, my experience as an audience member is going to be one of tremendous intimacy.

But if I keep one of those actors very close and send another far away upstage, it’s going to change my relationship with one of them with whom I have a much closer, intimate relationship to that other person who is much further away. I might begin to have an empathic response to the person who’s closer compared to the one who’s more distant.

As an actor, it’s valuable to understand that your audience is experiencing, particularly in theater, your work as a kind of three-dimensional sculpture that’s constantly changing shape. As a director, it’s important to understand that everywhere that bodies are in space communicates something to your audience, as you might learn from an online performing arts education. So, it’s better for that communication to be intentional rather than accidental.

Look at the theater as a field and look at the incredible capacity that it can hold. You will notice that there are many kinds of theater. There are so many different expressions, and they take different shapes. What are they? How do we get a handle on them?

I have a couple of answers. The thought that often emerges is this idea of different theater genres and different kinds of theater frameworks. It is crucial so that we have a toolset with which to discuss. To look at theater and engage in the different expectations.

There is a kind of way that one can understand contemporary theater. I’ll focus on that for a moment. First, there is that kind of work that would be considered playwright-driven work. It is work where the initial collaboration and the initial impetus come from somebody. The person puts a kind of text framework that focuses and becomes the foundation for making the work. The idea is that the play is what reigns supreme. It is the fundamental guiding principle.

There’s another kind of work that functions on a collaborative model. Work that brings a group of individuals together to devise, make, and create. Or to research and bring together a new piece, a new work together. This kind of approach sits on a question, a research action, or a series of interviews. Also, it could be an exploration that allows the piece to take shape. The result might be a written text, but not necessarily the beginning space.

These two are spaces where the text sits as a significant part of the conversation. There’s a third space I want to draw our attention to, and it’s the space of physical work. Physical work created collaboratively or already with a plan. It’s about physical expression. Also, there may be language, which is a kind of secondary part of the performance.

These three pods become essential. There’s another one that I would frame. I find it problematic, but it’s essential to know. It’s a framework often termed classical work, and we inherited this language over time and space in the theater. It is present particularly throughout Europe and the Americas.

When folks say “classical,” they often refer to Shakespeare or Greek theater from the Classical era, Aristotle and Euripides. During that moment, there was philosophy, which influenced the creation of plays. It is of what we framed as classical.
There are a few more things included depending on who you discuss. Definitively, when one looks at classical, one is often looking from a Eurocentric standpoint. Again, I find that a little bit problematic.

If we’re going to speak classical over a particular area, I always invite that we look at it on a global scale. Look at Japanese Noh theater, a kind of theater that was great in Japan. In the 15th century, we looked at Chinese opera. Also, we ought to look at India’s Kathakali, and Indonesia’s wayang kulit-like. All these different traditions do have a kind of classical narrative. These narratives are an essential part of performing arts education. They are a significant subject, even in online performing arts education.

People give theater critics a bad name. More often than not, they think of a theater critic as a person who says just negative things. “[There’s] a stereotype of the place, it’s opening night, and then everyone has kind of raced to the bar essentially, and they’ve looked at the newspaper. And the newspaper says ‘Oh, this play is terrible,'” states Dr. Harvey Young, an online performing arts education professional. “And that’s not actually the job of a theater critic.”

The job of a theater critic is actually to be an honest, objective, and reliable performing arts education source for a larger public. Their purpose is to acknowledge that not all of their readers will ever go see the play, but that they still want to be informed. They want to know more about what is happening.

The critic will tell readers, honestly, what they think of the production and be objective. They are not related to anyone who made the play. They are not an actor in the production. They will just tell you whether or not it is worthwhile for you to spend your hard-earned money and two to three hours of your time to attend the event and to see the show.

The performing arts critic is not going to be negative. They’ll just be honest. That is the job of a theater critic: to connect with the reader and share their opinion. The thing about theater critics is that those critics who are truly negative never last long. You’ll notice that likable theater critics become the most passionate and ardent advocates for certain productions. “[If] you look at the theater criticism around “In the Heights,” which was Lin-Manuel Miranda’s play before “Hamilton,” that play was nurtured, it was supported, it was sort of praised again and again by theater critics going, ‘Hey, you’ve got to go see this thing,'” Dr. Young says.

The same thing happened with the work of Tennessee Williams. People had no idea who Tennessee Williams was. It was early theater critics who said, “There’s something happening down the street. You’ve got to go check this out.” When “A Raisin in the Sun” first came out, there was a buzz created by critics. It was critics who saw the play in New Haven, Chicago, and Philadelphia, preparing an audience on Broadway for its arrival there.

Lloyd Richards, who directed the play, remembered standing in the ticket lobby of the theater. An African-American woman arrived to buy a ticket and he asked her, “What inspires you to see this production?” She replied, “Well, it was Sidney Poitier. He’s in this.”

“Well, you can see Sidney Poitier on screen for a fraction of the price,” replied Lloyd Richards. Her response was “I’ve heard about this play, and I’ve heard it concerns me.”

That quote, “I’ve heard it concerns me,” is a testament to the power of theater critics to get the word out about why theater matters for people.

When you’re analyzing a script, I think you might do well to sort of pick one of those characters and track all those tensions, and then pick two characters and understand how the conflict’s happening. Then pick the family and understand where the conflict’s happening. It’s a show full of a lot of conflict. Characters are in conflict with each other, inside the family and outside the family.

On top of it, the mother decides that she’s going to buy a house. She’s going to buy a house in a white neighborhood. So, everybody has to ask, “What does it mean to, sort of, grow?” But there’s a plant that’s struggling to live, struggling to live in the sun, struggling to live in the sun like a raisin in the sun. Is it going to be the raisin or is it going to grow?

It doesn’t have a lot of sustenance, but it’s got love. It’s got attention. It’s got what the family can give it. So, on some level that’s what the show is about. It’s also about the family to sort of come apart in certain ways, so that they can then come together again. That’s what I think the play is about, and that’s how, as an actor, that’s what I would suggest. If I was scoring it, if I was directing it, I would say, “OK, where do those tensions live? This incident that happens… what is being revealed, and what is being played with, and what is being exposed?” What opportunities do the characters have to transcend where they are, to think of new stuff, to take a chance and to think of something new?

That’s how I would analyze this script, that’s how I would see my way through this—through this artificial thing called a play that happens to be called “Raisin in the Sun.”

[In performing arts,] what human stuff can be brought out? That’s how I would approach the script analysis. I challenge you all to try to uncover that stuff for yourselves.